did At that time a judge not behave properly, how close to put new evidence , the lawyers said in Los Angeles. Against the judge , meanwhile, a former prosecutor had testified . In the lawsuit , the lawyers put also an appeal against a court decision , after which the volatile director trotting personally must with the U.S. justice system.
Polanski's defenders argued that the California law does allow her client that he would be convicted without having to personally go back to Los Angeles. The 76- year-old is accused of sexual abuse of minors. He is currently in Switzerland, under house arrest.
U.S. Attorney prosecuted Polanski since 1977
In January, a judge in Los Angeles Polanski's application is rejected on conviction in absentia. His decision to be done with regard to the integrity of the judicial system , the judge said. The deputy prosecutor of said the accused was a fugitive and there should not be that he the court dictated the terms of proceedings.
The U.S. Justice Polanski pursued since 1977, when this a then 13- year-old girl was drugged and raped. The director put then on a plea of guilty and was sitting 42 days in prison withdrew in 1978 but the continuation of the process by fleeing abroad.
The director was on 26 September 2009 due to a U.S. arrest warrant, on entry arrested to Switzerland. On payment of a deposit and in compliance with additional requirements imposed he was released in early December from custody and with a foot ankle provided in his chalet in Gstaad placed under house arrest.
No comments:
Post a Comment